German Institute for Adult Education (DIE)  
 
 

nach oben

Poster Romania

The Professionalism in Adult and Continuing Educational Staff in Romania

 

                                                                                                                                            Institution: Romanian Institute for Adult Education


Contact: Serban Iosifescu

I. The Premises (2000 – 2007)

  1. There were no specific requirements for the training staff and training delivery at national level:
    • Before 2000, there were no national regulations and no common view regarding the training and the adult education:

-          the trainers were trained in very different ToT programs: from 3 days to 2 years, with different pedagogical approaches etc.; no ToT programs at university level;

-          unclear target groups;

-          no professional status for trainer and for other associated categories of staff (training programs managers, coaches, tutors etc.);

-          the trainer’s activity is regulated by others – administrators, managers etc.;

-          no common culture, ethos and shared values;

-          very few professional organizations;

    • Each training provider was allowed to hire trainers accordingly their own internal regulations, interests and will.

-          the lack on a national approach produced uncertainty and doubts regarding the trainers and the ToT programs;

-          the trainers were hired on a personal basis (knowing / hearing about someone) and not on competence or performance;

  1. There were  specific requirements at sectorial level:
    • The education sector: ToT programs and accredited trainers in national reform programs, usually funded from abroad – Phare, World Bank etc.; after the end of the programs, the certification acquired was no more taken into consideration for further programs;
    • the health sector: internal regulation regarding the trainers’ evaluation and accreditation, based on sectorial standards;
  1. The beginning of the regulation at national level for authorization of the training providers and graduates’ certification.

·        The law for Continuous Professional Adult Education and the subsequent regulation (The procedure for Authorization of the Training Providers, the Procedure for the Graduates of the Training Programs Certification) introduced – 2000 – 2002.

·        The establishment of the National Adult Training Board (NATB), in charge with the adult professional education and training. NATB was nominated as National Qualification Authority.

·         The obligation of the training providers to use professional trainers was established beginning with 2010.


 

II. The State of the Arts (2007)

  1. Occupational standard for “Trainer” (since 2001 and revised in 2007).
    • For units of competencies in 2001: the training planning; the training delivery; the trainees’ assessment; the review and the promotion of the training programs.
    • 8-9 units of competencies in the revision proposal from 2007 (not yet validated and approved):

-          compulsory competencies: the training activities planning; the training delivery; the trainees’ assessment – with content changes accordingly with a proposed new, unified concept of “trainer” (see below);

-          optional competencies – for trainers with specific tasks: the marketing of the training programs; the planning of the training programs; the use of advanced methodology; the evaluation, the review and the quality assurance of the training programs.

  1. The use (since 2002) of the national regulation for authorization and certification (mentioned above):

·         Difficulties: bureaucratization of the procedures; the lack of monitoring capacity; the lack of experts in evaluation; huge variation in the quality of the authorized programs; not all the important training providers were interested to get authorized.

  1. Still no obligation for the training providers to use certified trainers.

·        The legal framework for the Continuous Professional Adult Education is in review.

·        National regulation regarding the recognition and evaluation of the competencies acquired in non-formal contexts.

  1. The establishment of the Sectorial Committee for Education and Training (2006).
    • The Sectorial Committees are national partnership structures (employers unions, trade unions, professional associations, regulating authorities, training providers etc.), dealing (among others) with the approval and the validation of the qualification within a specific sector.
    • In 2006 was established the Sectorial Committee for Education and Training, Research and Development and Sports. One of the Sub-Committees is dealing with the In Service Training. Its main tasks were to develop a new occupational standard for trainer, to elaborate the Statute of Trainer, a Code of Professional Conduct for trainer and to promote the establishment of a professional association at national level.
  2. Increased concern of all stakeholders for quality.

·        The establishment in 2006 of the National Group for Quality Assurance in Education and Training - a national structure created in order to harmonize the quality concept and standards in education and training - as a National Reference Point for ENQA-VET.

·        The establishment of two National Agencies for Quality Assurance in Education.


 

III. The Vision

  1. A unified concept for “trainer” based on common core competencies but differentiated for specific functions:

·         The extension of the “trainer” concept for all categories of trainers.

·         Common core competencies for all trainers, not depending of the level of qualification s/he works.

·         Common «Framework programs » for ToT.

·         Common procedures for the trainers’ evaluation and accreditation.

·         The differentiation of the specific categories of trainers by optional competencies.

  1. Professional association(s) of trainers as self-regulating bodies.
  2. The “Trainer” is a “regulated” profession.
  3. In order to acquire authorization, all training providers have to employ qualified staff:

·         Certified trainers and consultants.

·         Managers trained in “Management of the training programs and institutions”.

·         The development of the higher education programs.

  1. Quality management systems are implemented.

·         More than 25% of the training providers have quality management systems according the existing international models (ISO 9001:2000, ISO IWA 2/ 2003, CQAF, EFQM etc.).

·         The Romanian training providers get National and European Awards for Excellence.

·         The Romanian trainers participate in international programs and their professionalism is recognized at European level.